why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCDXGV5NOFIMFRTD4WTGO5SYO74LXAUPE4CNKHC5SN5TIRI6SGDLCMVO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9aa3470626067342385abd0574d01b0339797e5993e96b6ef295aa2eff7ef3d4
- request
- 5b1a76fa5f62bd8b75821faf37b8c457d74c0150940738ffc1420fe400e5c07f
- transaction
- bb15ebbd2b12e719157a2c1d50090bcaef8f6398de10f5787d9c3a3182f6900dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56415
the chainentry 56415
- sealed to the entry before
- 683fb0613850f4c7017840e974a0ab0ccc9170665d8dcd6d45f47d0c6b72d4e5
- this leaf
- 96b64598894da8e15c4b520ec46b727c6e816937b383f4e3c5a6e69fe8f5534f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- fGhs34hZ2yj58Bn9dco2puTBZKcYMamq8qZBTPC+nNWBm4N08LdQrGfGC2inicRjennUbsF83JV5Nd/HHS2XCg==