why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAW65FHSTRS42NLCOCAKXCK6M6NETXY3HJROOD6Z636SDUWSNSAVJFJW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7804cac1eb67b99dea6bd7fd36bdc64f80bccabd0871f53134cf117dd7db1ff1
- request
- 2eacb04670f8bc38d49423dd418d7ca1a91af2b7ba1a96173f8fb3f1c2eb2a5e
- transaction
- 125bad5f8052b69adcbdda7fe1f2eb3f47b78bdc09846749d37e18819702d599computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56327
the chainentry 56327
- sealed to the entry before
- 847dce83020e0ac957ba328482c0cc03226dfacf6add6211c7ddd951e9c38e6e
- this leaf
- 970c97a502f1a634d03ba0b42c408b4f49c1710b2b0fa574e7f0d4092754b9e5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- rR4WcsuQf5SgzxIno+TB5xt+l6ILTWzgsxs0xhF5c0tW6XpFJAP0yeqYuO5zxF2NEQEiv/0PRFoMExiUZTxWCg==