why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB52EIYMWU55ZC3HGUBJT67DP7XF6SQ4JO6KJLK2TC32MT5XXCWRGEPX, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB52EIYMWU55ZC3HGUBJT67DP7XF6SQ4JO6KJLK2TC32MT5XXCWRGEPX is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9ba065c0a06d594e80fd5a71d07cf8b7b5036b90916d5e10a75f34eb645c6321
- request
- 1e93120f5f0d2b90e90a198dad4f86e54af7bdd94e291670dbb3d4773ce3075b
- transaction
- a02c150d6cc6e4cd7d381f2b26a54849318c70b808dba45b10ab872544f6656bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 75957
the chainentry 75957
- sealed to the entry before
- 0cbc4659bedfb14b68051eebac5382fa2ccc8fc8729dc11d8cef2319eb3a8242
- this leaf
- 973083bcf1d0af6495e9bf8a40cc5b1d98e803790b0e1cb5485774d1a0ab9534
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 23CnCPUqV30VA55+aZPBu4IpUxKra4gaRu8/eyc5GnLJXQeTdHJyQzppDEb8YFL/zegtgBljWpQuhqa+ZC97AA==