why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCXGKJLZGHFWNLXSY32A3P5ENVHLDBGEVZ7F5TORPZ7LMRB2RK7R5PAR to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 923d749f77eaaa018530e2251452e4d0d553cbf810c77342b5c7dc7b1e1e4eb2
- request
- 93f0daf23bb0d8494527f9a8bb7d7711df3376aceebbc174e25412ba804028dc
- transaction
- 18ea3e2647f86bf56df6acf66d99c7cf7f6a607edfd70ddad7a1025b17311f49computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 59743
the chainentry 59743
- sealed to the entry before
- d7ab0aacd961521e57e2dc511d240f807ff84e670142b5eaef5d40a8bbc9fb50
- this leaf
- 978999b6fa4a6dbe2a39df3ee037662a9784d2824bfe3dea7875a336351aaac9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- JWw43sUAI0oFBFfCvrXeWIcXjIudtfAcxxXx/g5zOXTeyqhx7J1YwC+mRyiBq8qD8nIWGZYPv6ArUwfg6oq6Bg==