why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCQ6BCIAXT2W5EAZXWBO7ZU3H4LUDXBWB654TVB4B56ZTGLGK5KGQWSM, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCQ6BCIAXT2W5EAZXWBO7ZU3H4LUDXBWB654TVB4B56ZTGLGK5KGQWSM is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 48e9f3a7c38a4c1845e3e8abd50292310b94acb99b3d67604539d68487f57777
- request
- 33cb81708d276b83f631456e1e416198613b607980f25896a69327e7a3aaa53a
- transaction
- e2c7d0ff961cce3e7d364442ccd0338f0e17914d7271b6ec7e8ca3c5bb39fba3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 777
the chainentry 777
- sealed to the entry before
- bc71dd5c8d7675a6f33abe625d7bcff032ab643418f4629884dfe09d9aab52df
- this leaf
- 980915af79fc6c6ed609120de006212769e4b7fe3d39a7cd4ea17349ab95a91b
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- HRjstZFngYzrr0exrFSx6gHm/QONfPk6ShHaAUDcU/7RlGpZNUDtKgwr3e42/CDVU+0Yol60MtlSxDbFfwW/DA==