why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCKSBYWS4X5MC7S3C2YYFRZRGSWL4CIZ2TIS7B4WOT3QEASC2ZRCZ6AN, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCKSBYWS4X5MC7S3C2YYFRZRGSWL4CIZ2TIS7B4WOT3QEASC2ZRCZ6AN is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e8592ff91e6066e008942989881b4b2673caf2853dccbc4c17f62f929676b106
- request
- 03f0c718f0570bf262cf9daa2dd9cb1b39d64fe2aa2f2f7e19921ffc668db451
- transaction
- 05c950bd64826adbf9a5b0cae5c9ed7be5ecf8250c6702c8572c5ab5099d6c0acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 39399
the chainentry 39399
- sealed to the entry before
- c56736dff79575e1a7042b2013de00950dda31a8f5675cf1e6b0d673ed4c55a0
- this leaf
- 992f51b9653e6e9d8f05ef75e14427b74b8b95b9e29bc734e17cb9fbb9ef7504
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- hx05zATGeo7MM7AztKZ3no68mrtsFT9wH7iiA4UVeW0N0Pja1/Qjh3oeR+z4u2Ac1EbI8F3KmoWvwR3BVWSBBw==