why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBWKVBYM3KL6JWI2D6ZC2KNI7IO4ITLV4GTRP4EHKT5BE7QLBESQEIC3, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBWKVBYM3KL6JWI2D6ZC2KNI7IO4ITLV4GTRP4EHKT5BE7QLBESQEIC3 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a01813ea98c2a50116a0f24e4dde211a63e5293f786ec65345b2718b5db55821
- request
- 367d4475d930eee4b64b3282eefc140a96d2b8c39d8c3fdb3a896350ce0204cb
- transaction
- 3bb015361655927f035cbc3c565a2c01051b7f414ea355eb8842b4fe3d76c389computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 63521
the chainentry 63521
- sealed to the entry before
- 9412f98d5cd6d462f22b5a89aa886a7866c2d80cd5ae4dfe23eca71b0193b379
- this leaf
- 99e51298ac322ba5b00304feb26137035ff01262403b449b6a536645172b1314
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- uYzVpoHCXiuX9w3nsH/JWEUux+VrCz1K5SQnYOc3ZpLahVrMPmHpPHXuQDJSCn6wQF3lGX8k+woeIvb5RGmqBw==