why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAJQODNUXMC6PBSZPNG43XQYH6QNTHTKX6XG4GS4IVLRBU4LYDZV7ZMH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- cf70f582e155a0fa0e2c18b35014a761d6e37547e6dd2217a48957b5e03d0c84
- request
- 8c6a7585c745160d49750fa41981d4e1f519b8294bbf5ca1ef200abdd574bf2c
- transaction
- 7ca6879111b4ed1b1d79041d661da275fd1984a52c4982f3314afe6f4adc28c9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 34458
the chainentry 34458
- sealed to the entry before
- bba9b0278ea051562fd59ffbc8a2ec2cb3cf02a7173915a35f5711f13549bd6f
- this leaf
- 9b1a757dc0988d43b3d7a831204c318e6f0254bacb76dfa73a10a2ebdf496709
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- QRvxXhHwDQAy9MGr3mKpiGz0lav5W2Q/d9nNjMH2thNCs2TPE45N4qtThmRmgZoK9yDpZhtfmd6KzjCSLMu6CA==