why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBZKFQ7IKZGMF5S2EWV53PGABAD3KXZGUU6OXCX6POKZQ2AAZ4NC3IYI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8b6ee30e6eb9534356f437062b2e1131eb7a6a350f840788b9c7f268f556887a
- request
- 5a1959fc1a65d112c99e451e4fb7031ada51992b384cb3d328f992da07fcd01a
- transaction
- de16e3220f0287ee6fd0e80fb38e296fa1107061464786769089e386a44e34adcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 69760
the chainentry 69760
- sealed to the entry before
- e3b78aa4ae59eb1c33bc7b87c53861ec2b6039dea45ba426b2d12b02f84b15db
- this leaf
- 9bcaad29bc8827770c6c3a6cb4a232cba9b4d2a0a2640f8973f1a6e356ea8f5d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- RXk1F3M2uL2S97O9Q4eUhNjqAkYE/OQfKvwQ+hEkNbd5eKX21v1gcCdOA0Eb1W8pP9SAqJzknE38X1Tf4ANzAQ==