why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAQBRQYDP7QBJPIVF3R7QGPDM4IQY5QTJCLUQ6MAVCO53LRD4BF4JL5P, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAQBRQYDP7QBJPIVF3R7QGPDM4IQY5QTJCLUQ6MAVCO53LRD4BF4JL5P is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 564c1955124a851c44ef8f0afd353c197dd053993c8989556a3378c7402a1f3b
- request
- d77910cf286b122f3883b6baece42937fbd4f21e59e8cfc3cc4141a791b6e792
- transaction
- 4068a535f08c3ba9e9b0bcf15ac30a1bac0c4c753f229d63c9d8926e5226c43dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28204
the chainentry 28204
- sealed to the entry before
- 59b8ea9572be9e1f504c24da2742c9cea2ec4acecddb3736a286950ed5da9cd5
- this leaf
- 9c34e4eaaaa889ef8864b8ad6bddc2ca973ca9fb5de77b4ec2ae1c6ebed5faf5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- q6EZb519K9FvyA47CffSEWnDT48drVbfRsD8mtCfbTWUlwTLVwgU+USryD5hWjb+dMwr5ZCH1Kjy+PIoqOHQDg==