why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAJQX63VUSAYQGF4JVDFD7V5VLEUXIGJ3GPOQKEQ2KJHHSVEIQB2AKEC, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAJQX63VUSAYQGF4JVDFD7V5VLEUXIGJ3GPOQKEQ2KJHHSVEIQB2AKEC is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d3463543ebc4e068ac9e0f7562d7891058d5566054d0d92bfb25d86fc5b8b821
- request
- 7993a4a0f33df76368827ce077b7d5fc15c1ff6d028df4e3ce377184d6781bbd
- transaction
- 14c7f7e3aa86ddee9d1c9d782fae765cf465368e65c029964c1f70acdf913942computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 2646
the chainentry 2646
- sealed to the entry before
- 242e88f397b15efeb2569b6705d7429799af20300a48cd2abebfd6b24780c46c
- this leaf
- 9e3bba17cb003344ab37278c98c98dd211df96be3c96709f76f5fc22961a4b7e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- FMjKXiBmUBwSwL6405a+c9MsLfXt4zr4DEgBO5KoAedscBQ/0icPTD6jwFtZriJeDxoJEuWYFd6Sxel4NFDaBg==