why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBZ5VFZJBOF5VOJ6JUKYW4ZTH3VBIZFBQEH7NIPNXFBW4Q5RKRT3FMIT, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_near_cap
op 0 pays 450.0000000, above 80% of the 500 cap, human approval required
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8160f7ec3ba80b725e7abcf4ea18d61babc6719e56ff20b629239e15f2fbe2ef
- request
- 4d34510c50f1f7022b1d190a0042bd369f3d7bb250af5965f8cfe79fa0a75b6f
- transaction
- cf2a02919b626957d7b7276b4eaf77c9ff54466a7b7917f36f7a7a416a2f772ecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50676
the chainentry 50676
- sealed to the entry before
- d119d699cacefdefec56939e8feee82c181cd12d8b699cf0e3b6b2e1261f5c13
- this leaf
- 9f4a3d9e47583443d9e3e1757e938f711c2582be5de29851d59f61a0b90c5363
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Pz1ehOjp+D3Rkx4ElOTTo4+efBzWOxyehw3Jw8CB5FFhetHoENEqwHwAd0Snxz7c/pCqT4uQUXifOZaXd7e6CQ==