livelog 31,625 entries · root 9dfb0334463f · read 00:32:48
the record/entry 30944
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBMWNS24EEGRNQRRF4OASM7WAVKEQYHY7QNS2ESTJ22DWTU3EML3DGWM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.958ms2026-09-01 12:07:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBMWNS24EEGRNQRRF4OASM7WAVKEQYHY7QNS2ESTJ22DWTU3EML3DGWM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
9a1a078d6527c944f0cda163e2f48080a934f8fbc93c59db6f6c8aad20a2efc0
request
5751668fabcae07e3f66b87fcc30583848305cd65e1e31a0be8e7c34d836366b
transaction
632230292976803906d1e9f4462d2ac3fa039144bda3b9a1a8480a6764bfa554
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30944
recomputing…
the chainentry 30944
sealed to the entry before
ad8c7c4d049b61083dc589021e9e8c79a1758cc266f2124b74700a05fb6f4dd6
this leaf
9f7d055b941273981f6fec53858ede555bc53d082619742193409393db93dbfb
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
kBdRzUDZm7ui+EjQ50Cy8OKGsKbhKWoddKwv5FQftDSzDviW/djQvoAsXrfoP+K1FoIGC99RnsB+oX2MeJSOAA==