why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBV63FQLZ4B45ZT72J2BOSXO4XFQPA3D6MMI2OXPWC3JHQVNVO5SSZRA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 2c7fca8a85b4b9f9372fdf4960480c4bb3def0743e6605bb274d55794278198e
- request
- db4a5832fb953c4e6cdfedd4126500f366f23d1a324cac3f2b3d5b38ae1913b9
- transaction
- 149a08eb7e9841454865b7bda6640d7596f2f8ab4fd69596c95b94b14d0da9d2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 4785
the chainentry 4785
- sealed to the entry before
- 3fb55e64066fd177d6c6e491ef5166034db0458a691fc487f96a855086518531
- this leaf
- a05974fd530f8e20e529935730ee7247ec88397c4754edc611b71bfd5405b5b9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- XGwzh+eaQBu/IcA9rR0jpxPpXqD1V/m1Hau43HKxfqd2nDPBdLhKAgPZ1WYNRgvITZ7XCoVTRBDjaYIdGVeaAA==