why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDBCXFX3Z3PCN22TVJTQGKQ7JNRXRKQGJUMUURPUQVUNL2IBWLKOG3L5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1cc0c95fa7ff80d79510ce216663a0bd8f59d2fd60d72341607e518c85b13083
- request
- 4e5dd9cca1eeebcc8f8efbff7e8946a6b1f3338fb1e13825bd061f63b89dcba9
- transaction
- 69bc2673fcd553b331e52253d718bac142d863fc9c3925f871f0f82a5551d34dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 25879
the chainentry 25879
- sealed to the entry before
- 2dec1819e0126605c5a7b208859d64f99577122377649f33f051990091c457a3
- this leaf
- a0f7405510f0e8436a3f2e7fb920ed7f3bf57541ce54604d49b0c156f7149732
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- LcezoDE0u89QrqR30WU4Y/c80FSo3W0u+0Hs62cfD2DlhmsK20DIr4YZn1Ox+wosJCTx+dQ0ViIreA8kPv+ZDQ==