why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDZ5JVY6VUOWWK7E4L4QN7WL3WXJLKL5AP25WRZ2QNJZ7KCLESPQR5J2 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b197065f0cc4c10cf2e5173ce3258c4bab09a84314788d3e5f420adaf3be109b
- request
- cf6e216fc539dd0df9ca28e8b748d9b393b209d5296f2b855c0bf741851cdbf7
- transaction
- c97c4bbb2b0a3d2c6c8770ada4f856787af46c1e8eedede30208622a55371bc9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 8445
the chainentry 8445
- sealed to the entry before
- 6b3b3048fafcabb1a49ec254a27c75d50df4b0c681060f399de02bf4129b88a9
- this leaf
- a13a326a8091c11437e03a93454f5daa10f9a4fee51ada29bf1f787a7d627167
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- z7P4odBMYExXeJKIDed6S8sWuKsFuzGn1q5y/FI8XQDrzY8+ZsNoIsM+su/zmvjrXXh+pCTRgqWRN5OoqiX2Ag==