why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCXQMIQ6WXDRETDIQPQURLXBPZUN5O24V2EMX4TXJA3344WZLAVSQSOK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6b3624a92c562456f48c6e4d5ade4ac3a868584f478e4e9037e983213cf1f1e1
- request
- ea053aad9c8f66072eb9f90f36c8d989adb31e014feacf3b5729e67d459e4fee
- transaction
- e166c94e253fe654bde33fe3552c3907d9ad0002e7f07dec653c3c86b7bcdd19computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 23029
the chainentry 23029
- sealed to the entry before
- ff87599e7ccb3eb79dd88088a9a0ad04c371cd2880b2ae6e7cc8726e5c524563
- this leaf
- a1528979ad0c76e8d921df8fccf09e32b387828ad34fe0b743a45f393713d163
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- s567VbI2OLXe9eq0WUZXTe2S+vXLKgsqc7gigcR4+dAA6e+ET2gHOVGSTy/WtxkB4V21aVrgOUJf3kdyt0NcDg==