livelog 44,517 entries · root 0738b890afe0 · read 00:05:23
the record/entry 43838
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDHCSDBKAVRIEW4JNOKXS2YIHSESTXUBYR6XZQIINT27MVFCAUFTC5MM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.349ms2026-09-11 11:30:10
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDHCSDBKAVRIEW4JNOKXS2YIHSESTXUBYR6XZQIINT27MVFCAUFTC5MM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
44d9cf567edb77f2befc0025c4740033190b4c9f7f5102c868db6716b529c885
request
cc73ccba5db7977e4bb4a72fbb41ac9710dca00d04116522b6f76c1ce231820d
transaction
c05022cd6d9b11e8007e836aa26fc7e0bf86d55318ff3c427ecf9dad08fe356e
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 43838
recomputing…
the chainentry 43838
sealed to the entry before
0fc6dae8b69330321a099f2e7c06d278dd673a3c42d73351d604680b8f55ecfa
this leaf
a17870cdfad6cd0bd0621b3f02961b3d2cf3932b8ba1c1016d4661ba3824044e
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
3TcPJTI10S3SKjBBa3zCwJNTrkbs8zJ8a9cmQVrR6ip8Agmr3dDreBu4R2Ew/PYaPUY1L92cFT8RyFoig/pqDA==