why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQFTP3NTHQJXA7EJM4QUN3PC7OPBD6QFVJ6SBQVTINI4R7KEHQN3MB4 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ad8305c9ab02d405696051c95e60afd7aef0fcf73ea64b71991d974a141bfb2c
- request
- 001c059e21166aade601f9d791626f2ceb58d34b4f5a036a766f7c4b3158afd4
- transaction
- 5a08608761a80191a768a30ed329f7a7b7cacb157bebfd1ce6a4959f1c03f6adcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57537
the chainentry 57537
- sealed to the entry before
- b02ada5c3e60b66f9ae146294351029f242fd27897a5540e87a47bc6e9614cfc
- this leaf
- a47d8b62e001072afc1c8e7a813f09190f8216beccee8df4fc3e2a1f8535d658
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- iDy+Qc9oG2c9zq3Z3WzQf/FRoojw5pWZ4KngC8PdKWagH1r9RM6FGcHHWvVsoctoiHXkZuU8DTP1LjjHNziyCQ==