why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBM6SVBS4IAZ5ENYNSF3B24V4JFOMJIQQBDX7M7MSOYOTPK5FRP6R3SR to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 2ea019603691d9f71dbc0a9168468fd38801bc6e105581efdd8aac0aa55c6d50
- request
- 1a6b0b3d9df13bbbeb35330c2c8d56f7a6efbe326baaf47f34cba91a1a586c73
- transaction
- 87699c23adf9c4d5abd8ed3ac6cc9fb34e1262b60d5b6c6fe78047d158794c5bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76604
the chainentry 76604
- sealed to the entry before
- d55e5638d5fa8f05f627d15f115fa0b68728baa2af930257a9d9bad814ac9440
- this leaf
- a5379df9da44caab654c3a1805c696fae69c053b68e9849b02c6300168f7dc2c
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- baIBR4bZwpNLpSWQ3SwJlXXnfwCAzZqYYnE4uBrl415SaZB+Zg+mL/iTfiq63T4ozrpGQzcduQoT4H7R9j7ADw==