why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBTYXQJNAHNMPJHRDTM2BSOGQNAODQHRIPLTXEL23VXRKLDPCEA3WF3Q, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBTYXQJNAHNMPJHRDTM2BSOGQNAODQHRIPLTXEL23VXRKLDPCEA3WF3Q is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 583ad4f8ec256a40831900f4043c9157da151d0fa7db745b7ad049bbf036c8e2
- request
- e9411abebd9f545ec2b52a97f52d5fdcf00375dc7bdf5c3ee1a6533b179c8b7c
- transaction
- f71225bd9bdaea654afcf93cb9341bd48a7f6659814601b7de57c27ccfc9218ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 347
the chainentry 347
- sealed to the entry before
- f013a1680dc483f7fb16fd4e7555d21e6d0e9f15cb6eb17d7c5ffbc7b37c773d
- this leaf
- a59c4bf74854d22290e244e1fea7e8a1183a836be4cd8e4c109fb86a6b05e82f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- MeJeT4DWasWodl071jv04wlTXTYtp5gSaFwPuvNV9WW+JxDTKnljSJ0tDH5OuN3zAee+ijfC9EB/kGDhsujVBg==