livelog 60,665 entries · root ee8a296a357d · read 02:30:28
the record/entry 60525
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDKSGIUOIVNAWO3CW56G6ULRYTHVTQQ6EKZYR5W6OCINCLGYCOTFA77F to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.836ms2026-09-24 00:00:15
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDKSGIUOIVNAWO3CW56G6ULRYTHVTQQ6EKZYR5W6OCINCLGYCOTFA77F to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
6961475044782c84508fe71870ea519002aab043d34b0836b836802b1686089c
request
d9e313a70f375e794fb8055c7119dcc6a472f47adeb68244c35bc96739900794
transaction
0b14a1396659d48372aaa05788a3125aad3bcd63ae7fd060865e48536fa9dce4
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 60525
recomputing…
the chainentry 60525
sealed to the entry before
93382a7cac197523b177cb3c6d81efcd9a35c71974e9407cf5eb96e17d756a50
this leaf
a6a202cbd1b48c88c7a34404d732cfd0094552071157994dec99447c6d5f3d86
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
oCZQQEMW8PKYEVt9pMed7t/jVa6vzl4BNeQsL0yim5sSn6XU++ft26+JRzIU6dY6EdCKv6nExZF/txCB4pEiBA==