why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCUMNCU4SO57TAV2DGGJUEJIK6KBTGGIPN7F6LPVUTHLNCYQ4SGQYZ5L, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCUMNCU4SO57TAV2DGGJUEJIK6KBTGGIPN7F6LPVUTHLNCYQ4SGQYZ5L is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d5dac7c2ff57744f1323cf5912ce64bc46b82b588092a94446b67ea66eae963f
- request
- f4340f9dd5de6fd99d4b88320f2a646d41d32eded55d0971c406292c48efeaa7
- transaction
- baa4b08c16dea3b14c28417a3aa7535b9762593e2e984d44a338b1b2345d7f34computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7937
the chainentry 7937
- sealed to the entry before
- b177d35bfa449b9e0de482097f293bce6f210d775851b76596c120a429409eaf
- this leaf
- a72e3b35a638d3a5fbb153c425750316a7a3615946854c7283e59ea9bb607fda
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Y5mrJaoQaKjqEwFDEd8g11DymPmv5WU2Bo7VS6YdIcOqFelehCKqeY1bt3Uaw0E1VWMhFvDC4b79natR6Bv8Bw==