why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBGXFAAM2SERQWY7S4WWSJAVA3OAZ52EHNS2UWH6ESDCCQSLZSZGIWTQ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBGXFAAM2SERQWY7S4WWSJAVA3OAZ52EHNS2UWH6ESDCCQSLZSZGIWTQ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 34898d8afd6eb685b6317fcc8a37d9fbfbaed091b25859cb2365f6a14c1209e1
- request
- dae0f278ae98f9b2431fba81acccf75f2bd630f48c99145ec5e7a164a85ef2a5
- transaction
- 912606efc30e2a00b58ea287997529905ca35bc6e1e4e2f1e321abb615305df4computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 48464
the chainentry 48464
- sealed to the entry before
- 39225429eeca766d0eda9623a77e02af1eba839f089b05db120f54f80fc15155
- this leaf
- a89b0f4fb3b04710aa45ac80b2d285b5791bdcb25b15cee1265ca54a18aa5a14
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- bdvWsusA69sQ4pR3aAFIqtlPR90NCkqtkp0UXBxpDUNtXuv9uEiD/d94iTWPv9WQV3Q0ZUJ/JaI3dyeoPnHPCA==