why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDGXP4MLJ6B5TBSKA77NLZFTZ5GVHXT6K6T5BY7A2VZTAR4JXMTNLLVR to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- dd2bb571066df25a52e4352fec3c7f4747dd6c09f8c7740b87c0044d0a27ab91
- request
- 8e749b68340ed7d2ec6d7d29bf51ce755141e6f04034e97f7a387ba5597f1d04
- transaction
- f5cedb6a7012321af890b136b574659167e32a56489952c6f64b0b06916885b9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 36204
the chainentry 36204
- sealed to the entry before
- 99667e0cd824d43de5d3c187ea1f019dd737d7cbda961ca457d81073afd36bf9
- this leaf
- a8d0132aa621163bbcc97c21718013243ba11f642fa0d7a0003798e98d9f3eac
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- olpGaG5JcJUQQtDI+e4p7QIxq20xp/TPeaEVcQ6BNXe+uNv4qnBmQedglrkEYs9jIgt3w2eo6HE21HP8fOaSAw==