why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDVQ7PZBSYFMPDU74NNB3FET5G2KTA4FGAILVHDGQVWPZ2BB5MH5QVED to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 60882a3f1b17299f05b46f5bc056a720e7cdf2c55561afeaa62882ca5b3b9fa3
- request
- 06b1e9c3fb4ad8075c8f04fb26694e8c845267c77a04c0ce784e8e6febfec838
- transaction
- 1946c6f7115fb3821493dc444d8f7ab00e323d23c95b5aa91235748874bca5d2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 34495
the chainentry 34495
- sealed to the entry before
- 6c72ebc9c50e257a21943e43370adf8360aafe70e476213bb3971b963254de87
- this leaf
- a9cd3449c7e88203d2f2060e5cd94f874a391ce9ff84839a63156b4a9a0a67f9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- h4OC+y5sOzvSCfaT0QHu71zS01I6Xnh7J2EBuH0GxfbE6z+1NFZyDZBEcP8bGwZkCLf9fi6fLL1LEUZPXJCaCQ==