livelog 43,651 entries · root 60a012a99492 · read 07:55:54
the record/entry 42709
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBZXG3PHEQCT6DHSHPP35J2TRI5TXY5I5Z5Z4JNMNNOAQSZUWRFVBRZC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.270ms2026-09-10 14:35:09
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBZXG3PHEQCT6DHSHPP35J2TRI5TXY5I5Z5Z4JNMNNOAQSZUWRFVBRZC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
826a1119a2044b0b7835ef0bd4af120e31fb1da4948c9719de621c9b4799cb7a
request
d0c205a8c737ef65e1da6c72bb8bb0204bbcffeafc448a41c05492b561c38ffb
transaction
edec172552c657d175120e6453195167731996213c77bf2dd95bd95600ab40c0
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 42709
recomputing…
the chainentry 42709
sealed to the entry before
dd5b162b800c9f5f124b90c8ca38b9f36e3c5d8d56152a4c70978fa0e5175989
this leaf
aa560c08bb9a3e367f2a5de545da9254d471f6505cc33ac372c541df7d2dd864
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
mesOQKBQs0vSkN9gJ8xaHWUWfUJKCieB08TqQ3evmXXkhIYKZekhcvEjwTHMc+p75c1tnJiTYBoIFVJinvTvBQ==