why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCIXBXWPEVUVDJR5XT2ZSM6YQQQX2BWC75RVLA3KV3OEJVNGFCKXCFFT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6fb6ecb28709c601c5c9d473fe5e2e4c90f520fca28ba600e59524cc1f8fa792
- request
- 1f35dd5c4b93aca9aa2b1b8370bb83fdc9e5131a2c2aa98f4e996d226db08be5
- transaction
- 5673f0e8d4dd6e990e85c9e7a0ba64db47e8cbef420b2dd26a8fc9cdc0f7f9f5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 22828
the chainentry 22828
- sealed to the entry before
- b9529fa9dcba8f44de653142994b85900c2ac27957328b507ea6b4401e010be8
- this leaf
- ab201ebd623e1c52a8cfa88e2c636c2b9833a00cc65907325577c409112a400f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 4xYbeByD9+8ywPf5Pvq6r4ovXO/83NiHhFuFpPCpwT6fq+X7sbruQoFSia2TwGWgf4GpyHW6qaMPjHAfxq4xAA==