why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBTY56CDB7OKS4YDTWYJHK45KDB6YJQLLYCC4MIP7TVTPCXVGKW4EXUG, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBTY56CDB7OKS4YDTWYJHK45KDB6YJQLLYCC4MIP7TVTPCXVGKW4EXUG is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 5e81dbf58d925727dcb9e3554d67fb514a8e8b1accab7a6ccf534b738a57cbef
- request
- 20f09d32ffb14a80edac110024373e86ba05ede3d6c2cc3c73cf65e27046e77c
- transaction
- e71470a6d580297b871acaf7099f41162199399bae8bf6d6096e24205c70f019computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 74886
the chainentry 74886
- sealed to the entry before
- da64496be79f99bb120b9b8c10a7a0ea89b33383c7efe6a928f5f742698e473e
- this leaf
- ab42db869dd610fcae4012583c8510477be345880c88bfdbaae48b23031f2992
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- M8Nq0obscyoDK1WN1c60qH1ua4jLD9eQ+zFuWZMkyiWe0aCqEsz62Mc1aod5v9XdLs0lYHFOf03Zc4Nv39hDBQ==