why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GD7Z4IKXDJOIQYGXIY7JLFT7XC7EW5L2AOAZFCVXY4YPBSXSRCGP4J24 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7fba7c7ada5875440d487c86c507c86db53eabdadf5d4882aeaea1a9898ed7b4
- request
- 560898760f80345d08aef92cdb6c2453fe7720dcafd6d13057f0716029ed609e
- transaction
- 6c5c11ceff553a11b4b9c7558ce4b633e1e3be47a7b2b3ca5148219156a5649fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 13566
the chainentry 13566
- sealed to the entry before
- 7c0d9dd3179a1bbcb2ce0c525a4c51afec4438b229b33d79934c20cc7e211cd6
- this leaf
- abd60ddbf315fb03b5e93866566720981b93a3b17d327484f877baa88e1ea3c1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- SvmZhrWAiMFQKE3lYSsutgM2pgRjXVjCrNWGTSLcM26Qg6vUwtCY9OAgndVvgzNmwz3OxjNzGHbWRGnaZMEBAw==