why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAYQ4HSWLQT6IGSJWADLKARDPSWSUCEICSDPWA5XQCHJH32I5E4Q2IDW, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAYQ4HSWLQT6IGSJWADLKARDPSWSUCEICSDPWA5XQCHJH32I5E4Q2IDW is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ccbad581db4f2f59368060d73fc09fbeeacd3d8e53f59468ff6b40fb5c63d4f7
- request
- a4dae24566ea38b585e3f6fedb521b2ba40cb84eef6f589f59aa2e53b796549f
- transaction
- bf81f467a35184897283f35dcd6926b701b71551c90457fdd2b4220a7e253485computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1451
the chainentry 1451
- sealed to the entry before
- d039cbf6b614ae80945cff0a78e5e57421c4dd5f80b72c3337597d6423efd169
- this leaf
- abf447a82194ae74a48a13c9508eac8b997888ec47a53adf050dcf8a5276112d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ZVPyBQGExGB6V5zUCPffMYBFID208wdMNeC1/rliyb13O7pnDPiMB8xOWzX0GlTJMkh2WndpUrC9SpU2SR+0CA==