livelog 31,405 entries · root 04d25541cbfd · read 20:40:44
the record/entry 30591
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDEXYO2Z7C2PVCMDXPOQ754TGNULRUWHF7Z3PS2CWPTC7CB72BTSZDYC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.657ms2026-09-01 05:37:36
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDEXYO2Z7C2PVCMDXPOQ754TGNULRUWHF7Z3PS2CWPTC7CB72BTSZDYC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
9cbe306437738acff73899e9b66eac11155ac38fd2982f024c63958d9d6b6e48
request
4857f895ed2c62d326777a0fa65bcf52b5af652eafe7aca173db06776ca10406
transaction
2935a58ab199afa10f0fbfa93d62646bfd7c539410f34847ef02efc4476974e6
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30591
recomputing…
the chainentry 30591
sealed to the entry before
e6d5c306fe48282281cc0ea16fc29088a2823e98113bb865e6ce9b95b6f459af
this leaf
ac4c81e8761c8659e4ebf1793fc55f9a4a2220bfebbcae8f825f1ee49abbe128
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
YQJ0J3hp9dO3+Z3AKNz2SkHmhreXP0bHxQI1fV+TDwBNV+GPohmaNNDyjWoC7s250t8nAe+je03+KrxYr2L0Dg==