livelog 10,232 entries · root 5cae1d1cd86a · read 11:12:46
the record/entry 10079
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCHTFRIQVSOFJ335V6RYBCFTYBG4WEGEYMQVSPPKQSOY4FXUMF2F2EXY to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 7.086ms2026-08-16 08:12:40
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCHTFRIQVSOFJ335V6RYBCFTYBG4WEGEYMQVSPPKQSOY4FXUMF2F2EXY to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
f5d0d32aa394d39a411fee64d4b7b39adf99a3115654f3c9e8ce69e28c5bf7af
request
d18b731c4ef3ceca63b094b425f2e196bc5402061485938a53f6f631225a6720
transaction
02553cb68bd6e9a36ebd531f1640fe7c6d91346c52f95335267ab1efb334d2ee
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10079
recomputing…
the chainentry 10079
sealed to the entry before
cf06b6d8a9ff75a2275399fee44777305648fd5e54c7d33e0892362c23f35937
this leaf
ac706c520a6f8a566226e61945394c3cf455a9571509ebec5457f453cb0c3f94
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
QxxhVcJkGSkVDGSOeTz/gVlKjewQhLIGnwTdc6kG7FhDCO7SPVjbU3vGn4q+AMYqxuM463SQ4r4plGoyatXKDA==