livelog 46,496 entries · root 8e153564a519 · read 12:05:23
the record/entry 44857
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDBQSQFL73DTKDD7OLHHSKONKWMVM22K7EPOYN34FRYLZUDIJ2TYLXCZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.993ms2026-09-12 06:15:10
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDBQSQFL73DTKDD7OLHHSKONKWMVM22K7EPOYN34FRYLZUDIJ2TYLXCZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
300d3e7d534e28517a83b329526ef49248418659252c05687e05adaf2571ea7f
request
0e7db802c5962d47e16ae22e10f879aa8c71a880b5f9ddbea9a761aabad3253b
transaction
85ae2279646aa4d3cefe2d018d7dfc584add26211793c59c2d413dddb895ff5d
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 44857
recomputing…
the chainentry 44857
sealed to the entry before
548545b39b8711733b04830eeb52161ba5430577e635ee4b2bca207c1a84d251
this leaf
ac7129878bcef2edac70319314d70f2865444309925d1e394f9645e23d5bc295
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
qLfLeAN9U50tv3Drbcy1F8Ij8GODHsCLo57f5oIbwJx9OYijRpiyZZJQ2MVM49puc4+MfEs5vd2r/VBrrDNsDQ==