livelog 21,917 entries · root 153271789ca2 · read 13:22:44
the record/entry 20492
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GC3UXJYPIU6BUQUQCO3MY4IEKCVGAL2Q75S2YPYHZNDS32KNVUDQ436E to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.140ms2026-08-24 10:32:29
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GC3UXJYPIU6BUQUQCO3MY4IEKCVGAL2Q75S2YPYHZNDS32KNVUDQ436E to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
a5cad2811d0d0086a05dcd4cf618533d298e144210dc7913013307aaca502492
request
f85e1d3c366a892904f97bd32732f4e961e1e278e76f4401150b6eae1997fab5
transaction
384a1fbfaf4f3af85e76cf917c0384f4935e1508c69dc2cc45be1b5e030bb278
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20492
recomputing…
the chainentry 20492
sealed to the entry before
0bc6136b3769232e9ce2a507e4e1273dbe9a052dec6b204d3ab6f26feee44988
this leaf
acc51e35478140df9d27bfd753a96c2db6ab81d843b472041d52a49e2f7e4823
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
Z5Lg12xQTcwi5xwqfdV2ClSBiBzV9Z8tyGdwIxYv6NQ7BYGBqCm2vd5ZGs9lxhH5X8g8HrRk3SXICIykd8SeCA==