why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GC7B5EIGU52GJTO3CDX5JD2XL22FCMMNCIZ7D57Q3PB4WIFHS54X5K7G, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBWBAKCKRLXK5M4Y63SX7VHQ6TNIUZ4CHIMQWYS3YQEQ2DPM6NNUG7M7, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBWBAKCKRLXK5M4Y63SX7VHQ6TNIUZ4CHIMQWYS3YQEQ2DPM6NNUG7M7 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f99dafc0d9f062cc9ee032109253cd421a38653ecaee2706f5ee92fefe5380d9
- request
- 01d8237b0bf606912c625a210e355d1442eadad5fab3ebe785212f06dfb53fcb
- transaction
- 34a67344eaa958236adf20c3f2ee82a61002e29a910ae321bf2599773e182296computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 66453
the chainentry 66453
- sealed to the entry before
- f1bf703ce4b44cdb8b7663d4e6a1df12b1406345d693233bedef7bfd9acf28bd
- this leaf
- ad8d202f3d3ac3abe94b1180b19f6272f29dfb53bce75a1d3a3216e0a356c45e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- EayfjdYt053ortqilnuE8cPw5brtgNBtbs+dDzBFZaVmwwNfJ58HDrGK950R0EXBcksyMp2YxcQL28t5NWpEBw==