why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GDP76VPV52WCIYVHKJ7AR3YMSCSYC2Q2L6FP7T27DB4B6AT2BWHMOQVI, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB7ZHARFZN63ENV4YLUHBUH6KRPZMDTDR3VAT26ZD6CONZPJFQWZTGNV, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB7ZHARFZN63ENV4YLUHBUH6KRPZMDTDR3VAT26ZD6CONZPJFQWZTGNV is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bcd67e14947774adf284f779967cf2c36685c01f23be7b72a5eeccf083f34cc2
- request
- 19236a58e7bbf0d6ce9ab2b9cdb7e4a6278aef7b20b7c7ba6047f0706a752751
- transaction
- f8d4953220c3d9f49379ff5404655f6c58c9d5857c6191f67323e00b4df4bf90computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 60424
the chainentry 60424
- sealed to the entry before
- b63a38b2852cab63fef89b8de46d89fe8fa2b57d867188572b1599a8d641df0a
- this leaf
- add76a4d9e9d7d3fc83eb85ad51d44eb41201aad1844634e3fcef93c63614c79
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- rkV/QG4S221bAKAi5qruF57a3pFnltvBmQw1v7e77x9TIpmiknZMl9HGyQ825Ynd9SuSec7CBrPHekaLOwqNAg==