why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB672KPESHGTHX2Y4ST7C4EVN6GYNJDMEXPFBAQ7EW3B45IRDFHW5I6O, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB672KPESHGTHX2Y4ST7C4EVN6GYNJDMEXPFBAQ7EW3B45IRDFHW5I6O is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1037e51eeaa05cf8242f6960845642070fe47e6f5ea89135f06b48947864dcc3
- request
- 40d4fffbe9ccb7c4c7745ba9823f0d1ed6691d567b721a94a76fb0cb44e9b6cb
- transaction
- 82f9e8308bb867922e21fa32d01f351ccaa0634a6b433995cad41fc2c3d33ef0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 41183
the chainentry 41183
- sealed to the entry before
- 8496886fa7a4eacbd3607187743fcd3aa0680d2a530193ab53ee0a29fa80ac1d
- this leaf
- aebad207bcce654d6b48b37224ae679d73c102330372d50ddfaaae2c1b8f37ad
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- eCbPph7krpds/+qB+DTyKXQnAr4B+MLddB6+v+ppN4uiTpwI85o/3wPo1LMiQ5l2yIDQYAfQ9Mb0m9lTzmRDBQ==