why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GA3KJ6FWWVAUDB4H6X7XP5TAOGRWG4GBBFDINTBD3WH2IMK5ZLLLG6HJ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GA3KJ6FWWVAUDB4H6X7XP5TAOGRWG4GBBFDINTBD3WH2IMK5ZLLLG6HJ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ce78e7e474dc327f5885109608b1f33292dee49fc4a944cd0ed4e255927f04a0
- request
- 9acdc7b8131c5eeb91765931f96d645607944a5cb0085bd91d536596d1728160
- transaction
- 342d4787cff1f37b42116c91606b32d5bb22b6e68a934cbdef4f26eb0b04191acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 48207
the chainentry 48207
- sealed to the entry before
- 9c9f0867d3e8ad887dcd57cfe20507a99e2737edb112101752e6795a1435cc14
- this leaf
- aed14995ce2e660b8b2fc4a3f91a2e175f5d173e5b5e943b39e5680e2b4dec74
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- VVScLp1AfyZdRLByaKYKMJdsizN2dGBk8NwEZ74rbyyua9S4SB9BuHsaCLht1uNrpbkhPpgd+FGk+gnbDxTcBQ==