livelog 10,379 entries · root 4de3bba2a7c1 · read 13:48:03
the record/entry 10168
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GADYNSQGZ5AGAMBSCOESDFWBWNBJKORG2AUSQABLKLQMBATR2V2VXBQQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.238ms2026-08-16 09:57:26
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GADYNSQGZ5AGAMBSCOESDFWBWNBJKORG2AUSQABLKLQMBATR2V2VXBQQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
02bc4536f165b6518497aaf178c50a0329d2dc53173857f2efcd1761eb87e0cf
request
022c4d421224b2dcd371b49644af17ef1cae8af888532b8c9a0f32e9ba52d62f
transaction
7cd8a6bc0bbbc89aa5cb268452e8e71b165d9eb91af40b5183545d0b5606d72b
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10168
recomputing…
the chainentry 10168
sealed to the entry before
2a72e3d6894fe384aecfb5f42266edfb2561ba5f9bb6ac13061f0c87e5c35913
this leaf
af662abd990dfe58b49aa8c0214ac18fd38002abbef0781b33d9cc0976424c0f
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
1IeUxTh+xUuvP3dX/JETqXeYqcuhrLyXs3AfflOfeNocS011VLS4ytpX8njVxyHQ9oArRHfSiw56xDD5AFGzBQ==