why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCGIWEZSMD3LOSKCEYXUXG6Z4FMUVEZCBUHY3FUTOGGCKNG4ZCQHVBRY, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCGIWEZSMD3LOSKCEYXUXG6Z4FMUVEZCBUHY3FUTOGGCKNG4ZCQHVBRY is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 71cfab333f5d405eadd7530a4bed630ddc5473c1b0f654b10daa22b44a79627c
- request
- e59d706a80e17d246cb3a48ca12116184ef528a46c88b5b34b99fd67815a05c2
- transaction
- a1b74c4e6f37217bd9317d85a376b7cb21a2b024a534c5556ab3ebaf67c3eda5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 48566
the chainentry 48566
- sealed to the entry before
- e464d0f1df1f1847949dbdbc412a0dc36c6b3c70ab6512022a85c52298d281a1
- this leaf
- af8aface9485518bc22b913a14bd2b74b65d629db271408a69444ca5e3d2e365
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 7WHCMSwTyOoA8N1y78msXwaI7vamJI0L1P1cLdsVit+lUUguy6k3QqM5jAD75XsfhQ3S0GoLwUIVpHsQmbx8Cw==