why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCKQM3SLQI35L52PJDNATPT54BT4A4T3L45INQ6SSYUJFRCTXYPHSSJA, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCKQM3SLQI35L52PJDNATPT54BT4A4T3L45INQ6SSYUJFRCTXYPHSSJA is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bf7fff71de1a41c75645e231b5034a75e7abcce1a7fea3b72afa3ea6c2fc86fd
- request
- 7aaece67b00e4fd8f86f1a6f275ec6d30d70d13b4a48dd6a1ee4377ea650f03f
- transaction
- b92e76fe3497fafe7df84f339a2506ae06ab4d86ff2c0bf96b732e2228e25d4ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 32574
the chainentry 32574
- sealed to the entry before
- dac0e67241b5f4b998d79167a22be37ef941bf8cc6e9d2a7f50b2b12df7aaaf3
- this leaf
- afbf08b0bd7536f21db26fd654baa232d306dff167c3aff81c41f5d8d53916e5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- /D8u5kN4MZdI8mUiqzNCqDFiXrCO/xbMLMxHERefhJ0t6EsPSoIhPChSf9NDVfNie5RVpH0aOk1OiUI0igOfAw==