why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDKVOM6LHBXW54C2FYFLFOQIHWFWTEQPMR5TTZMG6XZZPUUEEZEI2MGM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b2ead1a2d100298e6710fd5ca0eca875f445b49b7a74fbe09a468de5d9fa1d7f
- request
- 715a176e1d05324d2a6bd079579685f5e5f81adf13e2a532c89211704273b828
- transaction
- 09ba7c0257ea3b9785da58542566b5ca7d3b1a5890ea8adf15f9116599da7dffcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 18307
the chainentry 18307
- sealed to the entry before
- 3acbf028493e6ce982553139e3a573bdbd17e7b5f17bdaf8fd3523906fd6f832
- this leaf
- afcdcf18ee26fe0850d595372a113c6c2117ce1658e57bfef63047683594cd91
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- c6bLpP8cTCCuTf2L+9AhFrhRfcDGV/EuFPJ4zOjW7iGvZVShgCH+7OpQ/HZpTUpQ3H4JpNzMq3o1ZXvpJo0/Dg==