livelog 11,673 entries · root 8844e75d4656 · read 13:33:23
the record/entry 6435
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBXHWJTWH3FQLF3WVI2SBF5LBJZWFJ7U7LYH6I3TBLS2OXCDLJ5JKFGT to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.384ms2026-08-13 11:22:25
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBXHWJTWH3FQLF3WVI2SBF5LBJZWFJ7U7LYH6I3TBLS2OXCDLJ5JKFGT to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
e0b5ad874974c8023fa02ce22dfb5a708c6b115114a764008d27dc175a4035f8
request
2dc114c643c4959d22c371b73c975885a3749e60936fb65ecf9bf26ccc94b106
transaction
bf19515e764ff1eb40fe5c3a78a81941d1992d9c93736e16cd485d6221ad99c0
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6435
recomputing…
the chainentry 6435
sealed to the entry before
95a60130867fca2a141805446424afae76edc654f444f713f8a9f4885d7420a1
this leaf
afde6a3dcc3019acb418435242e16c2eed9c31cb7fb931456912f92b73502fbc
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
MX6fmrOWfny0FLEYZHDHty3PVOjvHbEMlHv7I36MeHbG+HXqMJsDfI7TEGfjPlp7kdI6ZTOnI424BFkBPpfXCw==