why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GA4ZSDNEBVB27TKIFQB4ABWFKDW5YKODRLYOOWXGDFJOBTYECDASXEXK, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GA4ZSDNEBVB27TKIFQB4ABWFKDW5YKODRLYOOWXGDFJOBTYECDASXEXK is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b3c3ae81978bcb21bcdb9f46c04486f543a649ec5bec8f9f5376c8ad698bdb47
- request
- af5fc63e1c8a78b80eb4d9c046cbee501ac7a0649e47a236c1f7738c6702fea2
- transaction
- 51a7c101f8c20c455ce0274163d282dc34d16a7bbe3e2c69d66195eb1d3318a6computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 54180
the chainentry 54180
- sealed to the entry before
- db4b6cb7e0f02c2af86f5ff9096057712f4dee3e99db2efdf782d4a0fd715f36
- this leaf
- b1ef0f42221a45e18cba6f88a2de21fa18fb5103924b42fe25c7c96e4d5414e4
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- OPPMXZAFvPrkXpo0I0GKXmZMOPNHlaPJ/AL8P7PYOoKdsXl7iIqKmhYjY647StY2l/SHTNcjaM/Qi7Wh/il3CQ==