why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDHUCZYIFQ5XBWE6QYFCPGPEXLFUXZXHY5Z4AD2CEQMZ4A62BVBX3RYS to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e581f5201e0e74fe2f58c6fd878dcfb82970d02fe8fc4b6bb2b4f3cf283f0dcf
- request
- 19c382e21e69d36740d61e0750a1c5f3600f044604de89a48f908b40cc5bab46
- transaction
- 2d94861c9b9442fcfe24b822134bde0ae22d940ba4dd10599a60549dba77ee6fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6317
the chainentry 6317
- sealed to the entry before
- 6914c30e4127889a1d69efd6e970edd2a399111cd13607502cf6f1e30308d735
- this leaf
- b31dbc57de91fb6b540326ac3cb6ecf1b0f729771a4f03d0809cdf00afcb99fd
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- YDCJ2z72kGZTmp0Hdi62ZITCtzmgksHFwk+p8FCe3Xq7B74s7bSCjAnXY7kCA/Mdo/HnPdV8HjqcvpoBhT1zCw==