why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GARY3I5EN4T4GUASGZLM3B37KR7SSRRFGKL4EA5Y2SUW2KSSOHPFNBV5, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GARY3I5EN4T4GUASGZLM3B37KR7SSRRFGKL4EA5Y2SUW2KSSOHPFNBV5 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- fdc6221f1f6b0ea348ac2875a597837e98dc4a68fa87b5bede28dd42df338f33
- request
- d490fa30d754ee3e2ae57a149858aad4032729de850f074a7a05d0f371580b33
- transaction
- 271bc42a1b2a14af3c2167be22d91f17d47b7698a4d5d67f0fc490c9b02bf5bacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 61954
the chainentry 61954
- sealed to the entry before
- f4c33361bbbcd4d6962bbcc7bbd2bfe0cda7e463de7855ce5a45d3dfd5fa967b
- this leaf
- b534ac787559928d28ce30be2ca9c98398081fc23d7861b307a6b63027035966
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- HvCb4yGHHfTgix4Dh5e3tzKE2JmYFGKt5s+XcoOq3G7cXMhf3FuE+xMrW2/udNi1G+lrKlvWkLP42sTk+8b4DA==