livelog 47,697 entries · root 773bff89a25b · read 10:15:46
the record/entry 47037
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDELVBG3Q3AZY6EOBHIE25M6VJIMUEFMBX35NARQPDUUBNQGGOCSBXQA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.806ms2026-09-13 22:15:10
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDELVBG3Q3AZY6EOBHIE25M6VJIMUEFMBX35NARQPDUUBNQGGOCSBXQA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
3e107abbd11c10d99bb0749bb3322ce0495e0364a84618a7372a6ff40ac5574b
request
79afaa8829cd510bb4a9fd348604e5ab7166aba5fa72dd486595635aa4240b50
transaction
860bf39ca0cd5a30af7cd15714bdcbcd12b1136c45e7c507692bd65fc86b5c16
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 47037
recomputing…
the chainentry 47037
sealed to the entry before
bb451efb691e3450d64c735cd20aa83b3539e2c0e4a9a53af455aeb02826c035
this leaf
b5411dd6fb98e36a7b26af17c6c863df126b6e55a58f4d5e3bb3a70b80cb971a
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
RDlw580bveRfAtVcT4Nwp2P46st7CLAcc0x9I1lvV8djXWxSyNFQ0OqnepTegeoUD9uDSfPPMYai0UjNIAn+AA==