why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GACFHONZDARJ6JZ746SSLIDND6HMP2LIPFLRPQHJW3KPMGXYWJSYTRJZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e9d3741067eb02e7e0490f8f5f6bfb663645885f4ae8cc97cc419bde57ff9f4d
- request
- f9e0322a4a9d5e754daf9d4b9c2ddc2ea7a0f9c5319f1d4d94e6dcff021842e3
- transaction
- 11d03cedb998c5a9e419ae70cc7584f341e701973bd3bcb6c68b87ecf1db31cfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 43805
the chainentry 43805
- sealed to the entry before
- 5c968251f04df1c731e8f4c80461ec41ead7603a04699be0cf946a1c071767a9
- this leaf
- b59add4c74a44091731f28e26beacc9541dcc87c8a20cc287c47b393a0be0286
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- xgkl3T3RUhHWB7my/avWGSnSzmic+CA4tZVEeUbebm0z3iXDZ2IaaMM2TuJA6EJZ8VPKG4D1bo1sUdsw1Z56Cw==