why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCQM3MICBJA2NS5PETHHACYD5A5ATNT7RXITGTEINNTK3UDT334A3VQA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 66f00f75f650a402fe937a48b80e485d9af8df4d82acbd7db243150e71d0e051
- request
- 833bed1a232ae8fb9d177bb646a5dc48d0f6348a0ae37f64da06c94e3b7f84ca
- transaction
- b5e56c52c5d9710e8eaf35643538962a76ce8ae9d71a85b4e9c457ab17d34743computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 62268
the chainentry 62268
- sealed to the entry before
- 19233bbb37771e3607df01a2c05c91730bdd5890be6cb98cffb7c5f4de004d5f
- this leaf
- b80c9e9c7799afd5a7d7c105b535aa83f8f3568747e964b3e5bc538b1a83e31f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- UNwLGh9uzmPTKXpZosiFhxGnbtwYfvsG5Gn6jC/pcQiDZ5EYmn+9lmL20RBu4RPHsOdlUiJsxdE5Bjrrx6kLCA==